<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments for WPKG Blog</title> <atom:link href="http://blog.wpkg.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://blog.wpkg.org</link> <description>a technical IT blog</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 16:26:07 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>Comment on CentOS &#8211; update / install PHP 5.2 by Links 27/2/2010: Kolivas&#8217; New Patches, Predictions for Sub-notebooks with ARM &#124; Boycott Novell</title><link>http://blog.wpkg.org/2010/02/27/centos-update-install-php-5-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1568</link> <dc:creator>Links 27/2/2010: Kolivas&#8217; New Patches, Predictions for Sub-notebooks with ARM &#124; Boycott Novell</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 16:26:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wpkg.org/?p=93#comment-1568</guid> <description>[...] CentOS – update / install PHP 5.2 [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] CentOS – update / install PHP 5.2 [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Cipher benchmark for dm-crypt / LUKS by Cus</title><link>http://blog.wpkg.org/2009/04/23/cipher-benchmark-for-dm-crypt-luks/comment-page-1/#comment-1566</link> <dc:creator>Cus</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 02:08:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wpkg.org/?p=70#comment-1566</guid> <description>@Chris: The default mode is aes-cbc-essiv:sha256 for LUKS with a 128-bit key, it&#039;s documented in the cryptsetup man page.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Chris: The default mode is aes-cbc-essiv:sha256 for LUKS with a 128-bit key, it&#8217;s documented in the cryptsetup man page.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Cipher benchmark for dm-crypt / LUKS by Chris</title><link>http://blog.wpkg.org/2009/04/23/cipher-benchmark-for-dm-crypt-luks/comment-page-1/#comment-1565</link> <dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 17:58:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wpkg.org/?p=70#comment-1565</guid> <description>Seems a flawed post, the most important benchmark was missing and thats the one with the default options (without -c set), so now I am sitting here wondering where does the default option sit in that league table.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems a flawed post, the most important benchmark was missing and thats the one with the default options (without -c set), so now I am sitting here wondering where does the default option sit in that league table.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Setting up DKIMproxy with Exim for DKIM and DomainKeys signing by Kent</title><link>http://blog.wpkg.org/2009/03/28/setting-up-dkimproxy-with-exim-for-dkim-and-domainkeys-signing/comment-page-1/#comment-1528</link> <dc:creator>Kent</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 19:34:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wpkg.org/?p=54#comment-1528</guid> <description>Wow. Great write-up. Wonder if you had the same guide but written for dummies. I am running a VPS on wiredtree.com Using a VPS cause i like the freedom it allows. Not becuase i am a serious web guy.
Problem is tat all my emails sent to any yahoo account is sent to the spam folder. Now I have enabled domain keys and it shows up fine in the head. But DKIM shows as neutral. So I need to get DKIM installed and working so that I can email folks who use Yahoo.
Now I have putty and know how to follow directions really well. So when you say, &quot;Exim should listen on an additional port – make sure you have something similar in your exim.conf file:&quot;. What i need to know is how to look at that file. I am talking about real frickin noob here. Assume you are asking your mom to do this.Is it smart to have someone with my knowledge do this? Probably not. But i don&#039;t have a choice. Support has said they can not help me. I have escalated my request but i am not counting on it.So can anyone help me here?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. Great write-up. Wonder if you had the same guide but written for dummies. I am running a VPS on wiredtree.com Using a VPS cause i like the freedom it allows. Not becuase i am a serious web guy.<br
/> Problem is tat all my emails sent to any yahoo account is sent to the spam folder. Now I have enabled domain keys and it shows up fine in the head. But DKIM shows as neutral. So I need to get DKIM installed and working so that I can email folks who use Yahoo.<br
/> Now I have putty and know how to follow directions really well. So when you say, &#8220;Exim should listen on an additional port – make sure you have something similar in your exim.conf file:&#8221;. What i need to know is how to look at that file. I am talking about real frickin noob here. Assume you are asking your mom to do this.</p><p>Is it smart to have someone with my knowledge do this? Probably not. But i don&#8217;t have a choice. Support has said they can not help me. I have escalated my request but i am not counting on it.</p><p>So can anyone help me here?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Setting up DKIMproxy with Exim for DKIM and DomainKeys signing by domainkeys+autoresponder .. ?? - cPanel Forums</title><link>http://blog.wpkg.org/2009/03/28/setting-up-dkimproxy-with-exim-for-dkim-and-domainkeys-signing/comment-page-1/#comment-1526</link> <dc:creator>domainkeys+autoresponder .. ?? - cPanel Forums</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 18:02:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wpkg.org/?p=54#comment-1526</guid> <description>[...]  [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Just how (un)reliable is Netcraft? by admin</title><link>http://blog.wpkg.org/2007/09/20/just-how-unreliable-is-netcraft/comment-page-1/#comment-1494</link> <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 07:50:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wpkg.org/?p=7#comment-1494</guid> <description>@Eimar: that&#039;s all just theory.Just go to a wildcard address like http://b-l-a-h.godaddy.com, or better, to netcraft&#039;s website which is supposed to check it&#039;s uptime:http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/graph?site=b-l-a-h.godaddy.comYou will Netcraft first registered it on 20-Sep-2007, on the day this blog post was published. Since then, Netcraft checked the uptime for this wildcard domain several times, and they didn&#039;t discard anything.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Eimar: that&#8217;s all just theory.</p><p>Just go to a wildcard address like <a
href="http://b-l-a-h.godaddy.com" rel="nofollow">http://b-l-a-h.godaddy.com</a>, or better, to netcraft&#8217;s website which is supposed to check it&#8217;s uptime:</p><p><a
href="http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/graph?site=b-l-a-h.godaddy.com" rel="nofollow">http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/graph?site=b-l-a-h.godaddy.com</a></p><p>You will Netcraft first registered it on 20-Sep-2007, on the day this blog post was published. Since then, Netcraft checked the uptime for this wildcard domain several times, and they didn&#8217;t discard anything.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Setting up DKIMproxy with Exim for DKIM and DomainKeys signing by Miraenda</title><link>http://blog.wpkg.org/2009/03/28/setting-up-dkimproxy-with-exim-for-dkim-and-domainkeys-signing/comment-page-1/#comment-1493</link> <dc:creator>Miraenda</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 23:15:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wpkg.org/?p=54#comment-1493</guid> <description>I don&#039;t see an issue either, especially since you could always create a script in /scripts/postwwwacct that would edit the dkimproxy_out.conf file to add the new domain and path to the key file for every new account created as well. Since cPanel will check for any scripts in postwwwacct after running wwwacct, this would effectively automate the additions after setting up such a script.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see an issue either, especially since you could always create a script in /scripts/postwwwacct that would edit the dkimproxy_out.conf file to add the new domain and path to the key file for every new account created as well. Since cPanel will check for any scripts in postwwwacct after running wwwacct, this would effectively automate the additions after setting up such a script.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Just how (un)reliable is Netcraft? by Eimar</title><link>http://blog.wpkg.org/2007/09/20/just-how-unreliable-is-netcraft/comment-page-1/#comment-1492</link> <dc:creator>Eimar</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 21:59:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wpkg.org/?p=7#comment-1492</guid> <description>I don&#039;t know how successful they are but Netcraft claims they discard the wildcard dns domains:http://news.netcraft.com/active-sites.htmlFree online service providers, like blogging providers, will do something similar, with the variation that they usually provide their accounts hostnames under a common domain name, instead of separate domains; the domain under which these accounts occur often uses Wildcard DNS, and in some cases any hostname under the domain will return valid but computer-generated content, with the hostname taken to be as an account name and interpolated into the content. Hence it is important for the active sites methodology to discard the actual words in the page and focus instead on the page structure, as represented by the HTML tag structure.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know how successful they are but Netcraft claims they discard the wildcard dns domains:</p><p><a
href="http://news.netcraft.com/active-sites.html" rel="nofollow">http://news.netcraft.com/active-sites.html</a></p><p>Free online service providers, like blogging providers, will do something similar, with the variation that they usually provide their accounts hostnames under a common domain name, instead of separate domains; the domain under which these accounts occur often uses Wildcard DNS, and in some cases any hostname under the domain will return valid but computer-generated content, with the hostname taken to be as an account name and interpolated into the content. Hence it is important for the active sites methodology to discard the actual words in the page and focus instead on the page structure, as represented by the HTML tag structure.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Setting up DKIMproxy with Exim for DKIM and DomainKeys signing by mangoo</title><link>http://blog.wpkg.org/2009/03/28/setting-up-dkimproxy-with-exim-for-dkim-and-domainkeys-signing/comment-page-1/#comment-1490</link> <dc:creator>mangoo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 23:26:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wpkg.org/?p=54#comment-1490</guid> <description>@Mihai Secasiu: you can also specify (in dkimproxy config) the paths to the keys generated by cPanel, I don&#039;t really see it being a problem.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mihai Secasiu: you can also specify (in dkimproxy config) the paths to the keys generated by cPanel, I don&#8217;t really see it being a problem.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Setting up DKIMproxy with Exim for DKIM and DomainKeys signing by Miraenda</title><link>http://blog.wpkg.org/2009/03/28/setting-up-dkimproxy-with-exim-for-dkim-and-domainkeys-signing/comment-page-1/#comment-1489</link> <dc:creator>Miraenda</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 22:56:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wpkg.org/?p=54#comment-1489</guid> <description>Actually, with a few changes, it is now working. The issues were due to exim also running on port 587 for an alternate port (cPanel has the option to add an extra optional port). Since many ISPs block post 25, I have it also running on 587.The changes that needed to be done were the following:In exim.confdaemon_smtp_ports = 25 : 465 : 587In /etc/init.d/eximif [ &quot;$ALTPORT&quot; != &quot;&quot; -a &quot;`grep \&quot;daemon_smtp_port.* $ALTPORT\&quot; /etc/exim.conf`&quot; = &quot;&quot; ]; then
echo -n &quot;Starting exim-$ALTPORT: &quot;
#                       TMPDIR=/tmp $DAEMONIZE /usr/sbin/exim -bd -oX $ALTPORT
#                       echo $RESULT
fiAfter doing those changes, restarting dkimproxy and exim worked to get it functioning.I appreciate the assistance and hopefully this information helps anyone in the future using cPanel if they also do the alternate port option for exim. Great tutorial :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, with a few changes, it is now working. The issues were due to exim also running on port 587 for an alternate port (cPanel has the option to add an extra optional port). Since many ISPs block post 25, I have it also running on 587.</p><p>The changes that needed to be done were the following:</p><p>In exim.conf</p><p>daemon_smtp_ports = 25 : 465 : 587</p><p>In /etc/init.d/exim</p><p> if [ "$ALTPORT" != "" -a "`grep \"daemon_smtp_port.* $ALTPORT\" /etc/exim.conf`" = "" ]; then<br
/> echo -n &#8220;Starting exim-$ALTPORT: &#8221;<br
/> #                       TMPDIR=/tmp $DAEMONIZE /usr/sbin/exim -bd -oX $ALTPORT<br
/> #                       echo $RESULT<br
/> fi</p><p>After doing those changes, restarting dkimproxy and exim worked to get it functioning.</p><p>I appreciate the assistance and hopefully this information helps anyone in the future using cPanel if they also do the alternate port option for exim. Great tutorial <img
src='http://blog.wpkg.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 15/17 queries in 0.016 seconds using disk

Served from: web3.syneticon.net @ 2010-03-17 04:42:24 -->