<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Just how (un)reliable is Netcraft?</title> <atom:link href="http://blog.wpkg.org/2007/09/20/just-how-unreliable-is-netcraft/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://blog.wpkg.org/2007/09/20/just-how-unreliable-is-netcraft/</link> <description>a technical IT blog</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 23:16:03 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: admin</title><link>http://blog.wpkg.org/2007/09/20/just-how-unreliable-is-netcraft/comment-page-1/#comment-1494</link> <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 07:50:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wpkg.org/?p=7#comment-1494</guid> <description>@Eimar: that&#039;s all just theory.Just go to a wildcard address like http://b-l-a-h.godaddy.com, or better, to netcraft&#039;s website which is supposed to check it&#039;s uptime:http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/graph?site=b-l-a-h.godaddy.comYou will Netcraft first registered it on 20-Sep-2007, on the day this blog post was published. Since then, Netcraft checked the uptime for this wildcard domain several times, and they didn&#039;t discard anything.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Eimar: that&#8217;s all just theory.</p><p>Just go to a wildcard address like <a href="http://b-l-a-h.godaddy.com" rel="nofollow">http://b-l-a-h.godaddy.com</a>, or better, to netcraft&#8217;s website which is supposed to check it&#8217;s uptime:</p><p><a href="http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/graph?site=b-l-a-h.godaddy.com" rel="nofollow">http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/graph?site=b-l-a-h.godaddy.com</a></p><p>You will Netcraft first registered it on 20-Sep-2007, on the day this blog post was published. Since then, Netcraft checked the uptime for this wildcard domain several times, and they didn&#8217;t discard anything.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Eimar</title><link>http://blog.wpkg.org/2007/09/20/just-how-unreliable-is-netcraft/comment-page-1/#comment-1492</link> <dc:creator>Eimar</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 21:59:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wpkg.org/?p=7#comment-1492</guid> <description>I don&#039;t know how successful they are but Netcraft claims they discard the wildcard dns domains:http://news.netcraft.com/active-sites.htmlFree online service providers, like blogging providers, will do something similar, with the variation that they usually provide their accounts hostnames under a common domain name, instead of separate domains; the domain under which these accounts occur often uses Wildcard DNS, and in some cases any hostname under the domain will return valid but computer-generated content, with the hostname taken to be as an account name and interpolated into the content. Hence it is important for the active sites methodology to discard the actual words in the page and focus instead on the page structure, as represented by the HTML tag structure.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know how successful they are but Netcraft claims they discard the wildcard dns domains:</p><p><a href="http://news.netcraft.com/active-sites.html" rel="nofollow">http://news.netcraft.com/active-sites.html</a></p><p>Free online service providers, like blogging providers, will do something similar, with the variation that they usually provide their accounts hostnames under a common domain name, instead of separate domains; the domain under which these accounts occur often uses Wildcard DNS, and in some cases any hostname under the domain will return valid but computer-generated content, with the hostname taken to be as an account name and interpolated into the content. Hence it is important for the active sites methodology to discard the actual words in the page and focus instead on the page structure, as represented by the HTML tag structure.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 91/163 objects using disk: basic

Served from: blog.wpkg.org @ 2012-02-10 21:03:41 -->
